By Jack Nash
15 November 2024
Are you considering submitting your research? HRB Open Research’s platform uses the F1000 publication model, which is advances editorial transparency through open publishing and peer review practices while avoiding bias and misconduct through rigorous pre-publication checks. Rather than relying on journal Editors (or Editor-Chief) to accept or reject an article, our in-house editorial team diligently […]
By Jack Nash
31 October 2024
Open science is gaining momentum in today’s research landscape. With more authors interested in the accessibility, reproducibility and transparency of their work, they need to consider where to publish their academic outputs. Launched by Health Research Board Ireland in February 2018, HRB Open Research publishes results originating from HRB-funded researchers. HRB Open Research is a […]
By Jack Nash
28 October 2024
Research projects are often long, complex, and made up of several detailed steps involving data collection, investigation, analysis, report writing, and more. And yet, only a snapshot of this work makes it into the final Research Article. By publishing every output of a research project as a standalone article type, you can get full credit […]
By Jack Nash
28 August 2024
Integrity, quality and transparency are at the forefront of modern scientific research. Using F1000’s unique publishing model, HRB Open Research can uphold these principles. In this blog, we will discover what sets us apart from traditional publishing venues, and dive into the benefits of publishing on HRB Open Research.
By Jack Nash
23 July 2024
In the ever-changing landscape of academic research, openness stands as a cornerstone for transparency and collaboration. However, it’s crucial to recognise that not all approaches to openness are equal. What is open access? Open access (OA) provides immediate, permanent, and free access to scholarly research published online so that anyone, anywhere, can read and build […]
By Jack Nash
28 June 2024
Being able to measure and demonstrate the impact of your research is vital. Funding is often tied to the reach and impact of research as funders want to achieve the greatest return on their investment.
Additionally, focusing on impact allows researchers to see the bigger picture and overall purpose of research rather than the process.
In this blog post, we look at how to measure research impact by both traditional metric-based methods and the real world impact of research outputs, and how you can make your research published on HRB Open Research more impactful.
When F1000 first launched, it set out to rethink how research is communicated, with the aim of greatly accelerating the sharing of new findings, bringing control of the process back to authors and the research community, and providing transparency across the full process, from underlying research data and code through to open peer review. These remain crucial principles on which all the F1000 platforms are based, including HRB Open Research. In this blog, Managing Director Rebecca Lawrence outlines the first of several adjustments to the F1000 publishing model – the move to editorial-led peer review.
By Jack Nash
30 April 2024
Science communication, particularly science journalism, is central to disseminating the latest research to policymakers, practitioners, the public, and other stakeholders. However, it’s vital that the research being communicated is sound and reliable to avoid misinformation and mistrust of research.